You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The `Module` Syntax is similar to the `With` syntax, but a bit different and for now is not handled by the script
314
314
315
-
### * not present or present as \[Star]
316
-
in Mathematica if you write `a b` or `a \[Star] b` is interpreted as `a*b`. So sometimes in the rules is written like that. When it happens i usually add the * in the mathematica file, and then i translate it
315
+
### * not present or present as \\[Star]
316
+
in Mathematica if you write `a b` or `a \[Star] b` is interpreted as `a*b`. So sometimes in the rules is written like that. When it happens i usually add manually the * in the mathematica file, and then i translate it
317
317
318
318
## Description of the script `src/translator_of_rules.jl`
319
319
This script is used to translate integration rules from Mathematica syntax
@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ end : nothing
356
356
```
357
357
The old method was to finds the defined variables and substitute them with their
358
358
definition. Also there could be conditions inside the With block (OddQ in the example),
359
-
that were bought outside.
359
+
that were bought outside. This is not done anymore.
0 commit comments