Skip to content

Conversation

@sanikachavan5
Copy link
Contributor

@sanikachavan5 sanikachavan5 commented Oct 23, 2025

Changes proposed in this PR

  • include initialDelaySeconds as a field to be updated by gateway controller

How I've tested this PR

How I expect reviewers to test this PR

Checklist

PCI review checklist

  • I have documented a clear reason for, and description of, the change I am making.

  • If applicable, I've documented a plan to revert these changes if they require more than reverting the pull request.

  • If applicable, I've documented the impact of any changes to security controls.

    Examples of changes to security controls include using new access control methods, adding or removing logging pipelines, etc.

@sanikachavan5 sanikachavan5 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 23, 2025 05:51
@sanikachavan5 sanikachavan5 changed the title demo code demo code for a customer issue Oct 23, 2025
@sanikachavan5 sanikachavan5 added pr/no-changelog PR does not need a corresponding .changelog entry pr/no-backport signals that a PR will not contain a backport label labels Oct 23, 2025
@sanikachavan5 sanikachavan5 force-pushed the sanikachavan5/include-inital-delay-seconds-as-field--for-gateway-controller-update branch from 9357a67 to d9103f6 Compare October 23, 2025 09:28
@sanikachavan5 sanikachavan5 force-pushed the sanikachavan5/include-inital-delay-seconds-as-field--for-gateway-controller-update branch from b15b906 to a4bec48 Compare October 28, 2025 19:16
@sanikachavan5 sanikachavan5 changed the title demo code for a customer issue enable updates to probes in gateways Oct 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

pr/no-backport signals that a PR will not contain a backport label pr/no-changelog PR does not need a corresponding .changelog entry

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants