Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Sorry for the delay. From the log, it looks like +FO does not work with *G or *H. The likelihood doesn't make sense as it decreases during the optimisation. So please refrain from this combination of model. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
I am using an alignment of amino acids to test the performance of ModelFinder (implemented in IQ-TREE multicore version 2.3.4 COVID-edition for Linux x86 64-bit built Apr 26 2024).
In the present case, I used the following command:
iqtree2 -s Aligned_proteins_concatenated.fst -st AA -m MF -mset mtVer -mrate *G,I*G,*R,I*R,*H -mfreq FU,FO,F -mtree -T 16 -merit AIC -safeThe program aborted while processing the
mtVer+FO+I*R2model (alignment and log file attached).Is this because the
I*Rmodel has not been implemented or is there a bug in the code?Incidentally, the program completed its task under the BIC criterion.
Feedback would be most welcome.
Lars
05_MF3_RHAS_AIC.zip
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions