Skip to content

Conversation

@gdalle
Copy link
Member

@gdalle gdalle commented Aug 5, 2023

Fix #99

Needs tests to ensure non-regression

Probably useless after #93 but could be merged into it

Tried to make the code a bit more readable by avoiding chained anonymous functions

@gdalle gdalle mentioned this pull request Aug 5, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 5, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 93.33% and project coverage change: +0.81% 🎉

Comparison is base (041d760) 84.25% compared to head (30644c4) 85.07%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #100      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   84.25%   85.07%   +0.81%     
==========================================
  Files           8        8              
  Lines         470      469       -1     
==========================================
+ Hits          396      399       +3     
+ Misses         74       70       -4     
Files Changed Coverage Δ
src/AbstractDifferentiation.jl 80.72% <93.33%> (+1.06%) ⬆️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

mohdibntarek added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2023
@mohdibntarek mohdibntarek mentioned this pull request Aug 6, 2023
@mohdibntarek
Copy link
Member

Closing this in favour of #102.

mohdibntarek added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

pushforward_function and pullback_function are confused by tuples vs single input

2 participants