Meeting to discuss some naming conventions #5
Closed
sanderdemeyer
started this conversation in
Polls
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
As mentioned in pull request #3, we would like to discuss the naming conventions of the Hubbard operators.
Currently, operators like$e_{1,\uparrow}^\dagger e_{2,\uparrow}$ )do not give enough information on what the tensor is, since operators like $e_{1,\uparrow}^\dagger e_{2,\uparrow}^\dagger$ and $e_{1,\uparrow}^\dagger e_{2,\downarrow}^\dagger$ could also be defined in the absence of symmetries.
e_plusmin_up
(that implement the operatorWe can have a discussion about this next week. To accommodate the different time zones, I would suggest to hold the discussion in the afternoon for the people in Europe. Feel free to suggest other dates and times!
0 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions