You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
DataFusion accounts memory only for blocking operators, assuming that there is some more or less fixed overhead on other data structures.
We are building an analytical engine where the main data source is Parquet. Users may submit numerous pipelines all reading multiple Parquet files asynchronously. Each such reader is an instance of async Arrow Parquet reader which is known to be memory-hungry as it reads the whole row groups in RAM. Therefore, the typical Data Fusion assumption about some small memory overhead on non-blocking operators doesn't work. In fact, we observe a lot of page faults and crashes due to aggressive Parquet reader behavior.
Are there any current best practices how to deal with this, or plans for improvements?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
DataFusion accounts memory only for blocking operators, assuming that there is some more or less fixed overhead on other data structures.
We are building an analytical engine where the main data source is Parquet. Users may submit numerous pipelines all reading multiple Parquet files asynchronously. Each such reader is an instance of async Arrow Parquet reader which is known to be memory-hungry as it reads the whole row groups in RAM. Therefore, the typical Data Fusion assumption about some small memory overhead on non-blocking operators doesn't work. In fact, we observe a lot of page faults and crashes due to aggressive Parquet reader behavior.
Are there any current best practices how to deal with this, or plans for improvements?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions