Skip to content

Conversation

@XComp
Copy link
Contributor

@XComp XComp commented May 12, 2021

See detailed description in original PR #15832.

git cherry-pick c903d5420b 102a09d9a9 c74c671974 6b2f070cb8 4c7f59bea0

There was some conflict that needed to be resolved for 4c7f59bea0 resulting in a0bfff8

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented May 12, 2021

Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community
to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review.

Automated Checks

Last check on commit 6b53f8b (Sat Aug 28 12:09:50 UTC 2021)

Warnings:

  • No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date!

Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks.

Review Progress

  • ❓ 1. The [description] looks good.
  • ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink.
  • ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from.
  • ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture].
  • ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good.

Please see the Pull Request Review Guide for a full explanation of the review process.


The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands
The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:

  • @flinkbot approve description to approve one or more aspects (aspects: description, consensus, architecture and quality)
  • @flinkbot approve all to approve all aspects
  • @flinkbot approve-until architecture to approve everything until architecture
  • @flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..] to require somebody's attention
  • @flinkbot disapprove architecture to remove an approval you gave earlier

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented May 12, 2021

CI report:

Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
  • @flinkbot run travis re-run the last Travis build
  • @flinkbot run azure re-run the last Azure build

@XComp XComp force-pushed the FLINK-22494-BP-1.12 branch 2 times, most recently from 8485daf to a0bfff8 Compare May 16, 2021 12:49
@XComp
Copy link
Contributor Author

XComp commented May 16, 2021

I had to fix a compiler error that was introduced during the backport

@flinkbot run azure

Copy link
Contributor

@tillrohrmann tillrohrmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the backport @XComp. LGTM. Merging it now.

XComp added 5 commits May 18, 2021 11:07
We experienced cases where the ConfigMap was updated but the corresponding HTTP
request failed due to connectivity issues. PossibleInconsistentStateException
is used to reflect cases where it's not clear whether the data was actually
written or not.
…n references

The previous implementation stored the state in the StateHandle. This causes
problems when deserializing the state creating a new instance that does not
point to the actual state but is a copy of this state.

This refactoring introduces LongStateHandle handling the actual state and
LongRetrievableStateHandle referencing this handle.
@tillrohrmann tillrohrmann force-pushed the FLINK-22494-BP-1.12 branch from a0bfff8 to 6b53f8b Compare May 18, 2021 09:07
@tillrohrmann tillrohrmann merged commit 6b53f8b into apache:release-1.12 May 18, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants