[Build] Migrate Python packaging to pyproject.toml with scikit-build-core #18239
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
Author
|
cc @tqchen |
tqchen
requested changes
Aug 27, 2025
Member
|
also cc @MasterJH5574 , would be great to test the wheel for specifically cuda related usecases like cutlass(maybe we need to also update mlc), |
Contributor
Sure. Happy to test when this PR gets ready. |
tqchen
approved these changes
Aug 27, 2025
Member
tqchen
left a comment
tqchen
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
one final comment, please cross check locally
Member
|
@tlopex @MasterJH5574 please help cross check once ready |
Member
Author
|
cc @MasterJH5574 |
MasterJH5574
approved these changes
Aug 28, 2025
Contributor
Great, I'll find a time in the next few days. BTW there is a windows CI error that we need to fix. |
Member
Author
How could we fix it? Just by committing again to restart CI? |
Member
|
windows should be fixed already by #18245. we don't need to be gree to merge We consider should followup and change the conda based windows ci to use the pip wheel based now that we have the scikit-build-core |
This was referenced Aug 28, 2025
MasterJH5574
added a commit
to MasterJH5574/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2025
Following apache#18239, this PR fixes a few issues we ran into during testing the packaging flow through scikit-build-core.
MasterJH5574
added a commit
to MasterJH5574/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2025
Following apache#18239, this PR fixes a few issues we ran into during testing the packaging flow through scikit-build-core.
MasterJH5574
added a commit
to MasterJH5574/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2025
Following apache#18239, this PR fixes a few issues we ran into during testing the packaging flow through scikit-build-core.
MasterJH5574
added a commit
to MasterJH5574/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2025
Following apache#18239, this PR fixes a few issues we ran into during testing the packaging flow through scikit-build-core.
MasterJH5574
added a commit
to MasterJH5574/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2025
Following apache#18239, this PR fixes a few issues we ran into during testing the packaging flow through scikit-build-core.
MasterJH5574
added a commit
to MasterJH5574/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2025
Following apache#18239, this PR fixes a few issues we ran into during testing the packaging flow through scikit-build-core.
MasterJH5574
added a commit
to MasterJH5574/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2025
Following apache#18239, this PR fixes a few issues we ran into during testing the packaging flow through scikit-build-core.
MasterJH5574
added a commit
to MasterJH5574/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2025
Following apache#18239, this PR fixes a few issues we ran into during testing the packaging flow through scikit-build-core.
MasterJH5574
added a commit
to MasterJH5574/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2025
Following apache#18239, this PR fixes a few issues we ran into during testing the packaging flow through scikit-build-core.
tqchen
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2025
Following #18239, this PR fixes a few issues we ran into during testing the packaging flow through scikit-build-core.
tqchen
pushed a commit
to tqchen/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 13, 2025
Following apache#18239, this PR fixes a few issues we ran into during testing the packaging flow through scikit-build-core.
tqchen
pushed a commit
to tqchen/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 13, 2025
Following apache#18239, this PR fixes a few issues we ran into during testing the packaging flow through scikit-build-core.
tqchen
pushed a commit
to tqchen/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 13, 2025
Following apache#18239, this PR fixes a few issues we ran into during testing the packaging flow through scikit-build-core.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pr migrates the TVM Python packaging system from the setup.py flow to the modern, PEP 517/518 compliant pyproject.toml standard, which allows us to produce a single, Python-version-agnostic wheel.
This change streamlines the process for both developers and users.
For local development, you can now set up a fully-functional editable environment with a single command:
pip install -e ..To create the distributable package for release, simply run
pip wheel -w dist ., which will produce a universal wheel in the dist/ folder. This ensures that end-users can reliably install TVM with a standard pip install tvm, regardless of their specific Python 3 version.