Improve int test coverage (pythonGH-104024)

Following discussion in https://discuss.python.org/t/bug-in-int-42/26360/5

This tests some of the things documented in python#100436

(cherry picked from commit 69bc86c)

Co-authored-by: Shantanu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <[email protected]>

Author: 2 people

Lib/test/test_int.py

@@ -149,6 +149,8 @@ def test_basic(self):
         self.assertEqual(int(' 0O123   ', 0), 83)
         self.assertEqual(int(' 0X123  ', 0), 291)
         self.assertEqual(int(' 0B100 ', 0), 4)
+        with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
+            int('010', 0)
 
         # without base still base 10
         self.assertEqual(int('0123'), 123)
@@ -215,6 +217,24 @@ def test_basic(self):
         self.assertEqual(int('2br45qc', 35), 4294967297)
         self.assertEqual(int('1z141z5', 36), 4294967297)
 
+    def test_invalid_signs(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
+            int('+')
+        with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
+            int('-')
+        with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
+            int('- 1')
+        with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
+            int('+ 1')
+        with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
+            int(' + 1 ')
+
+    def test_unicode(self):
+        self.assertEqual(int("१२३४५६७८९०1234567890"), 12345678901234567890)
+        self.assertEqual(int('١٢٣٤٥٦٧٨٩٠'), 1234567890)
+        self.assertEqual(int("१२३४५६७८९०1234567890", 0), 12345678901234567890)
+        self.assertEqual(int('١٢٣٤٥٦٧٨٩٠', 0), 1234567890)
+
     def test_underscores(self):
         for lit in VALID_UNDERSCORE_LITERALS:
             if any(ch in lit for ch in '.eEjJ'):