@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ the following causal consistency guarantees:
136136
137137|checkmark| Read own writes |checkmark| Monotonic reads |checkmark| Monotonic writes |checkmark| Writes follow reads
138138
139- .. topic :: Scenario 1 (Read Concern "majority" and Write Concern "majority")
139+ .. note :: Scenario 1 (Read Concern "majority" and Write Concern "majority")
140140
141141 During the transient period with two primaries, because only ``P``\
142142 :sub:`new` can fulfill writes with :writeconcern:`{ w: "majority" }
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ the following causal consistency guarantees:
193193 reflects a state of the data after Read\ :sub:`1` (i.e. an
194194 earlier state reflects the data read by Read\ :sub:`1`).
195195
196- .. topic :: Scenario 2 (Read Concern "majority" and Write Concern "majority")
196+ .. note :: Scenario 2 (Read Concern "majority" and Write Concern "majority")
197197
198198 Consider an alternative sequence where Read\ :sub:`1` with read
199199 concern :readconcern:`"majority"` routes to ``S``\ :sub:`1`:
@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ provides the following causal consistency guarantees *if causal consistency impl
273273
274274|checkmark| Read own writes |checkmark| Monotonic reads |checkmark| Monotonic writes |checkmark| Writes follow reads
275275
276- .. topic :: Scenario 3 (Read Concern "majority" and Write Concern ``{w: 1}``)
276+ .. note :: Scenario 3 (Read Concern "majority" and Write Concern ``{w: 1}``)
277277
278278 During the transient period with two primaries, because both ``P``\
279279 :sub:`old` and ``P``\ :sub:`new` can fulfill writes with
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ provides the following causal consistency guarantees *if causal consistency impl
375375 earlier state reflects the data read by Read\
376376 :sub:`1`).
377377
378- .. topic :: Scenario 4 (Read Concern "majority" and Write Concern ``{w: 1}``)
378+ .. note :: Scenario 4 (Read Concern "majority" and Write Concern ``{w: 1}``)
379379
380380 Consider an alternative sequence where Read\ :sub:`1` with
381381 read concern :readconcern:`"majority"` routes to ``S``\ :sub:`1`:
@@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ cannot guarantee causal consistency.
482482This combination may satisfy all four causal consistency guarantees in
483483some situations, but not necessarily in all situations.
484484
485- .. topic :: Scenario 5 (Read Concern "local" and Write Concern ``{w: 1}``)
485+ .. note :: Scenario 5 (Read Concern "local" and Write Concern ``{w: 1}``)
486486
487487 During this transient period, because both ``P``\ :sub:`old` and
488488 ``P``\ :sub:`new` can fulfill writes with :writeconcern:`{ w: 1 } <\<number\>>` write concern, a
@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ the following causal consistency guarantees:
553553This combination may satisfy all four causal consistency guarantees in
554554some situations, but not necessarily in all situations.
555555
556- .. topic :: Scenario 6 (Read Concern "local" and Write Concern "majority")
556+ .. note :: Scenario 6 (Read Concern "local" and Write Concern "majority")
557557
558558 During this transient period, because only ``P``\ :sub:`new` can
559559 fulfill writes with :writeconcern:`{ w: "majority" } <"majority">` write concern, a client
0 commit comments