fix: update minimal.js to evade override mistake #1742
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
See https://github.com/Agoric/agoric-sdk/blob/master/patches/%40confio%2Bics23%2B%2Bprotobufjs%2B6.11.3.patch The original code used assignment to override the `constructor` and `toString` properties inherited from Error.prototype. However, if `Error.prototype` is frozen, as it is under Hardened JS (aka SES) or under the Node frozen intrinsics flag, then this assignment fails due to the JavaScript "override mistake". `enumerable: true` would accurately preserve the behavior of the original assignment, but I'm guessing that was not intentional. For an actual error subclass, this property would not be enumerable, so my PR currently proposes that. But either would work, so let me know if you'd like me to change it. `configurable: false` would accurately preserve the behavior of the original, but I'm guessing that was not intentional. For an actual error subclass, this property would be configurable. But either would work, so let me know if you'd like me to change it.
alexander-fenster
changed the title
alexander-fenster
approved these changes
Jul 7, 2022
|
Thanks! |
This was referenced Jul 8, 2022
Merged
turadg
added a commit
to Agoric/agoric-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 26, 2024
turadg
added a commit
to Agoric/agoric-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2024
turadg
added a commit
to Agoric/agoric-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2024
turadg
added a commit
to Agoric/agoric-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2024
turadg
added a commit
to Agoric/agoric-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2024
turadg
added a commit
to Agoric/agoric-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 29, 2024
turadg
added a commit
to Agoric/agoric-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 29, 2024
gibson042
added a commit
to Agoric/agoric-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2024
gibson042
added a commit
to Agoric/agoric-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2024
gibson042
added a commit
to Agoric/agoric-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2024
gibson042
added a commit
to Agoric/agoric-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2024
gibson042
added a commit
to Agoric/agoric-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See https://github.com/Agoric/agoric-sdk/blob/master/patches/%40confio%2Bics23%2B%2Bprotobufjs%2B6.11.3.patch
The original code used assignment to override the
constructorandtoStringproperties inherited from Error.prototype. However, ifError.prototypeis frozen, as it is under Hardened JS (aka SES) or under the Node frozen intrinsics flag, then this assignment fails due to the JavaScript "override mistake".enumerable: truewould accurately preserve the behavior of the original assignment, but I'm guessing that was not intentional. For an actual error subclass, this property would not be enumerable, so my PR currently proposes that. But either would work, so let me know if you'd like me to change it.configurable: falsewould accurately preserve the behavior of the original, but I'm guessing that was not intentional. For an actual error subclass, this property would be configurable. But either would work, so let me know if you'd like me to change it.