Skip to content

Conversation

@aggieNick02
Copy link

@aggieNick02 aggieNick02 commented Oct 31, 2022

This has been broken for a long time (9 years).

We do this by using spawn.get_preparation_data() and then using the values in that dictionary appropriately. This lets us also fix the setting of sys.path (which never worked) and other minor properties of the forkserver process.

While updating the test to verify these fixes, we also discovered that forkserver was not flushing stdout/stderr before it forked to create a new process. This caused the updated test to fail because unflushed output in the forkserver would then be printed by the forked process as well. This is now fixed too.

…n for a

long time (9 years).

We do this by using spawn.get_preparation_data() and then using the
values in that dictionary appropriately. This lets us also fix the
setting of sys.path (which never worked) and other minor properties of
the forkserver process.

While updating the test to verify these fixes, we also discovered that
forkserver was not flushing stdout/stderr before it forked to create a
new process. This caused the updated test to fail because unflushed
output in the forkserver would then be printed by the forked process as
well. This is now fixed too.
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 31, 2022

All commit authors signed the Contributor License Agreement.
CLA signed

@brettcannon brettcannon removed their request for review November 1, 2022 22:53
@ambv
Copy link
Contributor

ambv commented Nov 11, 2022

Hey @aggieNick02, thanks for this fix. It looks promising. However, the change should go against the main branch and not 3.10 as the issue needs fixing in 3.12 and 3.11 as well.

I realize we weren't sufficiently explicit about this in the past so I updated the devguide to explain what's up:
https://devguide.python.org/getting-started/pull-request-lifecycle/#good-prs

@aggieNick02
Copy link
Author

Ah, ok. Thanks for updating the instructions to make it clear. I wanted to do whatever gave it the best chance at making it into 3.10 (to be part of Ubuntu 22.04 LTS). I'll make a new PR against main shortly. Thanks!

@aggieNick02
Copy link
Author

Alright, I put this against main. In the process realized I wasn't passing down the raise_exception option in one place. So I added a test that would catch that and fixed it. #99515.

@aggieNick02
Copy link
Author

Closing since obsoleted by new PR against correct branch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants