Replies: 4 comments
-
In the W3C Annotation Model I see "Annotations have 0 or more Bodies." -> seems that this is the best answer. A highlight / bookmark is serialized as an annotation with no body. For a bookmark, the target selector is a "pointer" to a precise location in the content, not a range selector (segment). There must be a semantic way to disambiguate annotations / highlights and bookmarks. The |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
There's a very thin line between:
Bookmarks usually target:
In some cases, bookmarks may also have accompanying tag(s) and a note from the user, but that's a more advanced use case than what's available in most apps. Highlights and annotations usually target:
The concept of highlights/annotations doesn't really exist in audiobooks. Highlights and annotations usually have a color as well, and may have variations in styles supported (for example underlined). They may also offer tags. The main difference that differentiates an annotation from a highlight being the presence of an accompanying note. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Note: in https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/#cardinality-of-bodies-and-targets, the model states that bookmarks and highlights are simply annotations with no body. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
To identify bookmarks without creation a new type ("type": "Bookmark") I've found that the W3C Annotation model defines a specific "motivation": "bookmarking" property. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Highlights and bookmarks are annotations without body.
How should we express it in the spec, so that we can serialize both?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions