@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ cfg_if! {
4444 // until the upstream rust issue is resolved, but this at least lets us make
4545 // progress on platforms where this type is important.
4646 //
47- // The supported architectures and OSes is intentionally very restricted,
47+ // The list of supported architectures and OSes is intentionally very restricted,
4848 // as careful work needs to be done to verify that a particular platform
4949 // has a conformant ABI.
5050 //
@@ -60,35 +60,39 @@ cfg_if! {
6060 pub type __uint128_t = u128 ;
6161
6262 cfg_if! {
63- if #[ cfg( libc_const_assert) ] {
63+ if #[ cfg( libc_underscore_const_names) ] {
64+ macro_rules! static_assert_eq {
65+ ( $a: expr, $b: expr) => {
66+ const _: [ ( ) ; $a] = [ ( ) ; $b] ;
67+ } ;
68+ }
69+
6470 // NOTE: if you add more platforms to here, you may need to cfg
6571 // these consts. They should always match the platform's values
6672 // for `sizeof(__int128)` and `_Alignof(__int128)`.
6773 const _SIZE_128: usize = 16 ;
6874 const _ALIGN_128: usize = 16 ;
6975
70- /// Since Rust doesn't officially guarantee that these types
71- /// have compatible ABIs, we const assert that these values have the
72- /// known size/align of the target platform's libc. If rustc ever
73- /// tries to regress things, it will cause a compilation error.
74- ///
75- /// This isn't a bullet-proof solution because e.g. it doesn't
76- /// catch the fact that llvm and gcc disagree on how x64 __int128
77- /// is actually *passed* on the stack (clang underaligns it for
78- /// the same reason that rustc *never* properly aligns it).
79- const _ASSERT_128_COMPAT: ( ) = {
80- assert!( core:: mem:: size_of:: <__int128>( ) == _SIZE_128) ;
81- assert!( core:: mem:: align_of:: <__int128>( ) == _ALIGN_128) ;
76+ // Since Rust doesn't officially guarantee that these types
77+ // have compatible ABIs, we const assert that these values have the
78+ // known size/align of the target platform's libc. If rustc ever
79+ // tries to regress things, it will cause a compilation error.
80+ //
81+ // This isn't a bullet-proof solution because e.g. it doesn't
82+ // catch the fact that llvm and gcc disagree on how x64 __int128
83+ // is actually *passed* on the stack (clang underaligns it for
84+ // the same reason that rustc *never* properly aligns it).
85+ static_assert_eq!( core:: mem:: size_of:: <__int128>( ) , _SIZE_128) ;
86+ static_assert_eq!( core:: mem:: align_of:: <__int128>( ) , _ALIGN_128) ;
8287
83- assert !( core:: mem:: size_of:: <__uint128>( ) == _SIZE_128) ;
84- assert !( core:: mem:: align_of:: <__uint128>( ) == _ALIGN_128) ;
88+ static_assert_eq !( core:: mem:: size_of:: <__uint128>( ) , _SIZE_128) ;
89+ static_assert_eq !( core:: mem:: align_of:: <__uint128>( ) , _ALIGN_128) ;
8590
86- assert !( core:: mem:: size_of:: <__int128_t>( ) == _SIZE_128) ;
87- assert !( core:: mem:: align_of:: <__int128_t>( ) == _ALIGN_128) ;
91+ static_assert_eq !( core:: mem:: size_of:: <__int128_t>( ) , _SIZE_128) ;
92+ static_assert_eq !( core:: mem:: align_of:: <__int128_t>( ) , _ALIGN_128) ;
8893
89- assert!( core:: mem:: size_of:: <__uint128_t>( ) == _SIZE_128) ;
90- assert!( core:: mem:: align_of:: <__uint128_t>( ) == _ALIGN_128) ;
91- } ;
94+ static_assert_eq!( core:: mem:: size_of:: <__uint128_t>( ) , _SIZE_128) ;
95+ static_assert_eq!( core:: mem:: align_of:: <__uint128_t>( ) , _ALIGN_128) ;
9296 }
9397 }
9498 }
0 commit comments