Skip to content

Conversation

@Noratrieb
Copy link
Member

std::env::set_var will be unsafe in edition 2024, but not before it. I couldn't quite figure out how to check for the span properly, so for now we just turn the false positives into false negatives, which are less bad.

`std::env::set_var` will be unsafe in edition 2024, but not before it.
I couldn't quite figure out how to check for the span properly, so for now
we just turn the false positives into false negatives, which are less bad.
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 2, 2024
@Veykril
Copy link
Member

Veykril commented Jun 3, 2024

I couldn't quite figure out how to check for the span properly

We don't carry hygiene around right now (aside from $crate resolution)
Thanks!
@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 3, 2024

📌 Commit 0e1353b has been approved by Veykril

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 3, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 0e1353b with merge 89218cf...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 3, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Veykril
Pushing 89218cf to master...

@bors bors merged commit 89218cf into rust-lang:master Jun 3, 2024
@Noratrieb Noratrieb deleted the rustc_deprecated_safe_2024 branch June 3, 2024 13:22
@lnicola lnicola changed the title Don't mark #[rustc_deprecated_safe_2024] functions as unsafe fix: Don't mark #[rustc_deprecated_safe_2024] functions as unsafe Jun 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants