review

Author: lcnr

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/assembly/mod.rs

@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
         goal: Goal<'tcx, G>,
     ) -> Vec<Candidate<'tcx>> {
         debug_assert_eq!(goal, self.resolve_vars_if_possible(goal));
-        if let Some(ambig) = self.self_ty_infer_ambiguity_hack(goal) {
+        if let Some(ambig) = self.assemble_self_ty_infer_ambiguity_response(goal) {
             return ambig;
         }
 
@@ -324,13 +324,13 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
         candidates
     }
 
-    /// HACK: `_: Trait` is ambiguous, because it may be satisfied via a builtin rule,
+    /// `?0: Trait` is ambiguous, because it may be satisfied via a builtin rule,
     /// object bound, alias bound, etc. We are unable to determine this until we can at
     /// least structurally resolve the type one layer.
     ///
     /// It would also require us to consider all impls of the trait, which is both pretty
     /// bad for perf and would also constrain the self type if there is just a single impl.
-    fn self_ty_infer_ambiguity_hack<G: GoalKind<'tcx>>(
+    fn assemble_self_ty_infer_ambiguity_response<G: GoalKind<'tcx>>(
         &mut self,
         goal: Goal<'tcx, G>,
     ) -> Option<Vec<Candidate<'tcx>>> {
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
         goal: Goal<'tcx, G>,
     ) -> Vec<Candidate<'tcx>> {
         debug_assert_eq!(goal, self.resolve_vars_if_possible(goal));
-        if let Some(ambig) = self.self_ty_infer_ambiguity_hack(goal) {
+        if let Some(ambig) = self.assemble_self_ty_infer_ambiguity_response(goal) {
             return ambig;
         }
 

tests/ui/traits/new-solver/assembly/assemble-normalizing-self-ty-impl-ambiguity.rs

@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
 // compile-flags: -Ztrait-solver=next
+// check-pass
 
 // Checks that we do not get ambiguity by considering an impl
 // multiple times if we're able to normalize the self type.
+
 trait Trait<'a> {}
 
 impl<'a, T: 'a> Trait<'a> for T {}

tests/ui/traits/new-solver/assembly/assemble-normalizing-self-ty-impl-ambiguity.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+// compile-flags: -Ztrait-solver=next
+
+// Test that we don't incorrectly leak unconstrained inference variables
+// if the projection contained an error. This caused an ICE in writeback.
+
+trait Mirror {
+    type Assoc: ?Sized;
+}
+
+struct Wrapper<T: ?Sized>(T);
+impl<T: ?Sized> Mirror for Wrapper<T> {
+    type Assoc = T;
+}
+
+fn mirror<W: Mirror>(_: W) -> Box<W::Assoc> { todo!() }
+
+fn type_error() -> TypeError { todo!() }
+//~^ ERROR cannot find type `TypeError` in this scope
+
+fn main() {
+    let x = mirror(type_error());
+}

tests/ui/traits/new-solver/dont-normalize-proj-with-error.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+error[E0412]: cannot find type `TypeError` in this scope
+  --> $DIR/dont-normalize-proj-with-error.rs:17:20
+   |
+LL | fn type_error() -> TypeError { todo!() }
+   |                    ^^^^^^^^^ not found in this scope
+
+error: aborting due to previous error
+
+For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0412`.