@@ -1202,6 +1202,34 @@ impl<A, E, V: FromIterator<A>> FromIterator<Result<A, E>> for Result<V, E> {
12021202 /// ).collect();
12031203 /// assert_eq!(res, Ok(vec![2, 3]));
12041204 /// ```
1205+ ///
1206+ /// Here is another example that tries to subtract one from another list
1207+ /// of integers, this time checking for underflow:
1208+ ///
1209+ /// ```
1210+ /// let v = vec![1, 2, 0];
1211+ /// let res: Result<Vec<u32>, &'static str> = v.iter().map(|x: &u32|
1212+ /// x.checked_sub(1).ok_or("Underflow!")
1213+ /// ).collect();
1214+ /// assert_eq!(res, Err("Underflow!"));
1215+ /// ```
1216+ ///
1217+ /// Here is a variation on the previous example, showing that no
1218+ /// further elements are taken from `iter` after the first `Err`.
1219+ ///
1220+ /// ```
1221+ /// let v = vec![3, 2, 1, 10];
1222+ /// let mut shared = 0;
1223+ /// let res: Result<Vec<u32>, &'static str> = v.iter().map(|x: &u32|
1224+ /// shared += x;
1225+ /// x.checked_sub(2).ok_or("Underflow!")
1226+ /// ).collect();
1227+ /// assert_eq!(res, Err("Underflow!"));
1228+ /// assert_eq!(shared, 6);
1229+ /// ```
1230+ ///
1231+ /// Since the third element caused an underflow, no further elements were taken,
1232+ /// so the final value of `shared` is 6 (= `3 + 2 + 1`), not 16.
12051233 #[ inline]
12061234 fn from_iter < I : IntoIterator < Item =Result < A , E > > > ( iter : I ) -> Result < V , E > {
12071235 // FIXME(#11084): This could be replaced with Iterator::scan when this
0 commit comments