Skip to content

Conversation

@Timer
Copy link
Member

@Timer Timer commented Aug 2, 2019

This removes the old prerender implementation added in #7699.

Motivation for this PR: It's really hard to review #7983 without looking at the actual changes, since it's completely replacing this one.
It'd be better to remove the old one and rebase that PR on top of this removal.

@Timer Timer added this to the 9.0.4 milestone Aug 2, 2019
Copy link
Member

@ijjk ijjk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Timer Timer merged commit 2ab300d into vercel:canary Aug 2, 2019
@Timer Timer deleted the remove-prerender branch August 2, 2019 14:28
Timer added a commit to ijjk/next.js that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2019
ijjk added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2019
* Revert "Remove Old Prerender Implementation (#8218)"

This reverts commit 2ab300d.

* Add contentHandler for page config

* Rename config from contentHandler to re-use
experimentalPrerender

* Remove un-needed changes

* Replace backslashes for manifest

* Update manifest output format

* Make prerender: true enable SPR behavior and update
to merge prerender-manifest for flying-shuttle

* Fix output path for / prerender file

* Add dynamic routes to test suite

* Add generating and previewing of skeletons
for prerendered dynamic routes

* remove inline prerender option

* update to not replace getInitialProps which allows
nested getInitialProps and add query when fetching prerender

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-Authored-By: Joe Haddad <[email protected]>

* Remove legacy prerender option

* Apply suggestions from review

* Apply more suggestions from review

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-Authored-By: Joe Haddad <[email protected]>

* Add handling of error when parsing json

* Update handling of moving exported pages

* Rename nextPreviewSkeleton to _nextPreviewSkeleton

* bump
@vercel vercel locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 1, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants