-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
ProbProg: Making trace an operand #1444
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…robprog-trace-operand
@wsmoses So I added Reactant.jl/src/probprog/Modeling.jl Lines 283 to 285 in 9bd1dee
Also GC triggered by mapped functions in Reactant.jl/src/probprog/Modeling.jl Line 292 in 9bd1dee
So I added Reactant.jl/src/probprog/Modeling.jl Lines 287 to 289 in 9bd1dee
(Adding trivial Base.isready for ConcretePJRTArray and ConcreteIFRTArray).
Does that sound like an ok-ish fix, or am i missing something? |
…robprog-trace-operand
…robprog-trace-operand
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1444 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 68.76% 66.02% -2.74%
==========================================
Files 103 109 +6
Lines 11380 12040 +660
==========================================
+ Hits 7825 7949 +124
- Misses 3555 4091 +536 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
@wsmoses Can we merge this large execution trace PR first and add new MH and MCMC interfaces into a new PR? |
We would need a rebase, the test failures should have been fixed a few weeks back. Also let's get the jll changes in first as a separate PR? |
…robprog-trace-operand
…robprog-trace-operand
No description provided.