[NETBEANS-5024] add support for generics angle brackets #8834
+340
−136
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mbien
added
Java
|
you formatted the whole file unfortunately :( We typically avoid doing unnecessary whitespace changes and limit them to the rewritten sections. (A few fixes here and there are ok, e.g same method) |
|
Sorry for that. I started with some debuging and some experiments and unfortunately I had a different formatting options. So after some time I realized that I had something that works but the source file was full of debug outputs and temporary code with a wrong formatting. So I tried to reformat the whole code as an attempt to fix it... |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Original issue #5024
This fixes a generics angle bracket highlighting. It works for a multichar token like GTGT and GTGTGT. It ignores logic and arithmetic operators. As we need to distinguish between these two cases, java parser is used for this check.
I added also unit tests.
There is a similar commit #8500 but I don't think it can work in this way and there is no other activity since May 2025.