CNDB-14199: Expose methods containsDateRangeTypeColumn

[ekaterinadimitrova2]

What is the issue

...
We need that knowledge for CNDB

What does this PR fix and why was it fixed

...
It exposes containsDateRangeTypeColumn methods

[github-actions]

Checklist before you submit for review

• Make sure there is a PR in the CNDB project updating the Converged Cassandra version
• Use NoSpamLogger for log lines that may appear frequently in the logs
• Verify test results on Butler
• Test coverage for new/modified code is > 80%
• Proper code formatting
• Proper title for each commit staring with the project-issue number, like CNDB-1234
• Each commit has a meaningful description
• Each commit is not very long and contains related changes
• Renames, moves and reformatting are in distinct commits
• All new files should contain the DataStax copyright header instead of the Apache License one

[ekaterinadimitrova2]

@pkolaczk , I just addressed your comment.

Also, for completeness, I want to mention that I am intentionally leaving the testing of the new methods to CNDB.

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

Exposes containsDateRangeTypeColumn methods to support CNDB functionality for detecting date range column types. This enhancement provides visibility into schema components that contain DateRangeType columns.

Key changes:

• Added public method to check for date range columns in table creation and alteration statements
• Implemented date range type detection in CQL3Type system

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File	Description
CreateTableStatement.java	Added public method to detect DateRangeType columns during table creation
AlterTableStatement.java	Added base method and override in AddColumns inner class for date range detection
CQL3Type.java	Added isDateRange() method with implementation for custom types and spelling correction

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}

[ekaterinadimitrova2]

Neither of the two failures flagged as regressions is related to the changes done here.

[maxtomassi]

Just a suggestion to avoid the use of hardcoded string name. Looks good otherwise.

[ekaterinadimitrova2]

Just a suggestion to avoid the use of hardcoded string name. Looks good otherwise.

Suggestion committed and branch rebased for final CI test, thanks!

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
0.0% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[cassci-bot]

❌ Build ds-cassandra-pr-gate/PR-1914 rejected by Butler

---

1 regressions found
See build details here

---

Found 1 new test failures

Test	Explanation	Runs	Upstream
o.a.c.index.sai.cql.VectorSiftSmallTest.testSiftSmall (compression)	<span title="The test is FLAKY on feature and PASSING on upstream:
• Feature branch: FLAKY because there are 1 passing, 1 failing, 0 missing, and 0 skipped runs in the last 2 runs in 4 builds (2 to 7)
• Upstream branch: PASSING in the last 7 runs in 7 builds (1578 to 1587)">REGRESSION	🔵🔴	0 / 7

---

Found 2 known test failures

[ekaterinadimitrova2]

testSiftSmall does not fail for me locally and it doesn't seem to be touching anything we touch here.