Skip to content

Conversation

jkingdon
Copy link
Contributor

The definition and the theorems intuitionize without a lot of trouble.

Includes a few additions to ^c theorems.

Includes dvdsfi (a natural number has finitely many divisors), extracted from a portion of the phisum proof.

This is the sigma syntax and df-sgm .  Copied without change from
set.mm.
A natural number has finitely many divisors.  The proof is taken
from a portion of the phisum proof.  Shorten the phisum proof using
dvdsfi .
Stated as in set.mm.  The proof is the set.mm proof with changes
needed to use fsumcl instead of sumex .
Stated as in set.mm.  The proof is the set.mm with a small change for
differences in ^c theorems.
Stated as in set.mm.  The proof is the set.mm proof with small changes
related to differences in finite set theorems.
Stated as in set.mm.  The proof is the set.mm proof with some small
changes for differences in finiteness and ^c theorems.
Stated as in set.mm.  The proof is the set.mm proof with small changes
around theorems related to finiteness and nonempty sets.
This is cxpmul2 from set.mm but where the base has to be a positive
real, not any complex number.  The proof is based on a portion of the
set.mm proof although most steps need some changes.
Deduction form of rpcxpmul2 .
Stated as in set.mm.  The proof is the set.mm proof with some small
changes related to set existence and differences in ^c theorems.
Stated as in set.mm.  The proof is the set.mm with a few small changes
to account for differences in finite set theorems.
Stated as in set.mm.  The proof is the set.mm proof with a small change
for differences in ^c theorems.
Stated as in set.mm.  The proof is the set.mm proof with several
changes for differences in ^c theorems and changing not equal to
apart.
Stated as in set.mm.  The proof is the set.mm proof with a few changes
for set existence and apartness vs not equal.
Stated as in set.mm.  The proof is the set.mm proof with changes for
finite set theorems and set existence.  In some parts of the proof the
changes are significant but some parts of the proof, and the overall
logic, are unchanged.
Stated as in set.mm.  The proof is the set.mm with small changes for
differences in ^c theorems.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant