Skip to content

Conversation

shariff-6
Copy link
Contributor

@shariff-6 shariff-6 commented Oct 2, 2025

Description

Adds Amazon EKS cluster documentation and expands the AWS v3 docs to cover additional supported resources.

  • Motivation: Provide guidance for ingesting EKS clusters, aligning with newly supported resource coverage in the integration.

Added docs pages

  • EKS cluster blueprint (/build-your-software-catalog/sync-data-to-catalog/cloud-providers/aws-v3/examples/eks/clusters/_eks_cluster_blueprint)
  • EKS cluster mapping configuration (/build-your-software-catalog/sync-data-to-catalog/cloud-providers/aws-v3/examples/eks/clusters/_eks_cluster_port_app_config)
  • EKS cluster properties (/build-your-software-catalog/sync-data-to-catalog/cloud-providers/aws-v3/examples/eks/clusters/_eks_cluster_properties)

Updated docs pages

Please include the path for the updated docs:

  • AWS v3 Overview (/build-your-software-catalog/sync-data-to-catalog/cloud-providers/aws-v3/Overview)
    • Adds “AWS Account Info,” “AWS Organizations Accounts,” and “EKS Clusters” to Supported resources.
  • AWS v3 Examples (/build-your-software-catalog/sync-data-to-catalog/cloud-providers/aws-v3/examples)
    • Adds an Amazon EKS section with blueprint, configuration, and properties includes.
    • Imports new EKS example components for clusters.

@shariff-6 shariff-6 changed the title Feat aws eks kind example Add EKS Cluster Example to AWS Hosted By Port Oct 2, 2025
@shariff-6 shariff-6 marked this pull request as ready for review October 2, 2025 09:28
Copy link

This pull request is automatically being deployed by Amplify Hosting (learn more).

Access this pull request here: https://pr-2852.d2ngvl90zqbob8.amplifyapp.com

Copy link
Contributor

@sivanel97 sivanel97 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants