-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
feat: read total slots header for serverless #1319
feat: read total slots header for serverless #1319
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
Warning This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
How to use the Graphite Merge QueueAdd either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:
You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link. An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository. Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue. This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
|
Claude finished @MasterPtato's task —— View job Code Review Complete ✅Todo List:
Review SummaryThis PR implements support for reading the 🟢 Code Quality & Best PracticesPositive aspects:
🟡 Minor Issues Found
🟢 Security Considerations
🟢 Performance Considerations
🟡 Test Coverage RecommendationsMissing test scenarios that should be added:
🟢 Architecture & DesignThe implementation properly follows the existing architecture:
Recommendations
Files & Lines Referenced
Overall, this is a solid implementation that extends the existing patterns appropriately. The minor issues identified are easily addressable and don't block the functionality. |
More templates
@rivetkit/actor
@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers
@rivetkit/core
@rivetkit/db
@rivetkit/framework-base
@rivetkit/next-js
@rivetkit/react
rivetkit
@rivetkit/sql-loader
commit: |
Merge activity
|
128cee0 to
5650abe
Compare
de19ac5 to
6d1f0f5
Compare
|
Claude finished @MasterPtato's task —— View job PR Review: feat: read total slots header for serverlessTodo List:
Review SummaryThis PR implements support for reading the 🟢 Code Quality & Best PracticesPositive aspects:
🟡 Minor Issues Found
🟢 Security Considerations
🟢 Performance Considerations
🟡 Test Coverage RecommendationsMissing test scenarios that should be added:
🟢 Architecture & DesignThe implementation properly follows the existing architecture:
Recommendations
Files & Lines Referenced
Overall, this is a solid implementation that extends the existing patterns appropriately. The minor issues identified are easily addressable and don't block the functionality. |
|
Claude finished @MasterPtato's task —— View job Code Review Complete ✅Todo List:
Review SummaryThis PR implements support for reading the 🟢 Code Quality & Best PracticesPositive aspects:
🟡 Minor Issues Found
🟢 Security Considerations
🟢 Performance Considerations
🟡 Test Coverage RecommendationsMissing test scenarios that should be added:
🟢 Architecture & DesignThe implementation properly follows the existing architecture:
Recommendations
Files & Lines Referenced
Overall, this is a solid implementation that extends the existing patterns appropriately. The minor issues identified are easily addressable and don't block the functionality. |

No description provided.