Add CLI support #12
Add CLI support #12
Conversation
|
Thank you for the submission @An-GG! I'll have a look at this in the next few days. On first pass, the printf bits in the logging with the ansii escape chars were initially a red flag for me - maybe remove those if they were just there for debugging. Looking further, it looks like some interesting stuff will have a deeper look soon :) |
|
|
||
| - (void)logError:(NSString*) message | ||
| { | ||
| printf("\x1b[1;91m%s\x1b[0m\n", message.UTF8String); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we should remove these printfs. I believe these are here to show output when running from the command line version - they might be better to just be in the logMessage function and not do the colours as we're assuming the colour scheme of the terminal.
| INFOPLIST_FILE = Info.plist; | ||
| INSTALL_PATH = "$(HOME)/Applications"; | ||
| MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET = 10.13; | ||
| OTHER_CODE_SIGN_FLAGS = "--deep"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't know what that does - I did a quick google search and it's not super clear, can you let me know?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
honestly i dunno, all I remember is that the project would not build in Xcode, there was some recommendation given by Xcode to fix the issue and I hit apply, and then it built (and then these edits showed up in the git diff)
- are you able to build with this change reverted?
- are you able to build with
xcodebuildfrom the command line? (its possible I made this change to fix command line only builds)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think it's a problem, I was just curious about it. Once it's merged and runs though the github action, if its an issue I'll have a deeper look.
| } | ||
| } | ||
| return nil; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is cool, and looks like good fun :) but did you try getopt? https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/functions/getopt.html has a few safety bits that might be nice.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ah that's neat.
looks powerful but gonna be honest personally I didnt find the interface of getopt all that intuitive
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No, it isn't intuitive at all :) it just covers some edge cases, and saves you from having to reimplement a few things. It does fall short in some areas too, but it is a useful tool to have at your disposal 🛠️
|
Hi Rob, happy to help you merge this PR. Should be able to get back to you on these concerns tonight. |
|
|
probably not the right place for this but great article. i learned something new |
This adds support for using the built executable from the command line. If valid command line arguments are detected, the file is extracted and the program exits without launching graphical windows.
Additionally, some improvements / organized some stuff: