Skip to content

Conversation

dhardy
Copy link
Member

@dhardy dhardy commented Sep 22, 2025

Essentially this is #675. Partial alternative to #725.

Copy link
Member

@josephlr josephlr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we should do this. Having two features makes things more confusing to me. One wasm_js feature is enough. Going with #675 seems better, see my comment: #675 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants