Skip to content

Conversation

hugoledoux
Copy link

@hugoledoux hugoledoux commented Sep 16, 2025

I am submitting

  • a new package
  • an update for a package

A Typst template that (more or less) replicates the TUDelft letter, which is only available in Word...

I have read and followed the submission guidelines and, in particular, I

  • selected a name that isn't the most obvious or canonical name for what the package does

  • added a typst.toml file with all required keys

  • added a README.md with documentation for my package

  • have chosen a license and added a LICENSE file or linked one in my README.md

  • tested my package locally on my system and it worked

  • [X ] excluded PDFs or README images, if any, but not the LICENSE

  • ensured that my package is licensed such that users can use and distribute the contents of its template directory without restriction, after modifying them through normal use.

@typst-package-check typst-package-check bot changed the title Add files v0.1.0 of tud-letter tud-letter:0.1.0 Sep 16, 2025
@typst-package-check typst-package-check bot added the new A new package submission. label Sep 16, 2025
@saecki saecki self-assigned this Sep 18, 2025
Copy link
Member

@saecki saecki left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this package! I've left a few comments regarding the name, description, and the readme example.

@typst-package-check typst-package-check bot changed the title tud-letter:0.1.0 almost-tud-letter:0.1.0 Sep 22, 2025
@hugoledoux
Copy link
Author

I have also changed the name of the folder, I think all is good now.

When/if I manage to see who can have official TUDelft templates, then we can indeed change the name. For now it's fine I reckon.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
new A new package submission.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants