Skip to content

STM32: Add STM32L5 in arm_pack_manager index file #14477

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2021
Merged

STM32: Add STM32L5 in arm_pack_manager index file #14477

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2021

Conversation

jeromecoutant
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary of changes

This fixes #14476

STM32L5 targets were missing in the arm_pack_manager index.

targets.json file is updated accordingly.

Impact of changes

Migration actions required

Documentation

Pull request type 

[x] Patch update (Bug fix / Target update / Docs update / Test update / Refactor)
[] Feature update (New feature / Functionality change / New API)
[] Major update (Breaking change E.g. Return code change / API behaviour change)

Test results 

[] No Tests required for this change (E.g docs only update)
[x] Covered by existing mbed-os tests (Greentea or Unittest)
[] Tests / results supplied as part of this PR

Reviewers

@jeromecoutant jeromecoutant mentioned this pull request Mar 26, 2021
Closed
@ciarmcom ciarmcom added the release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch label Mar 26, 2021
@ciarmcom ciarmcom requested a review from a team March 26, 2021 11:30
@ciarmcom
Copy link
Member

@jeromecoutant, thank you for your changes.
@ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

Patater
Patater approved these changes Mar 26, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@Patater Patater left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mergify mergify bot added needs: CI and removed needs: review labels Mar 26, 2021
@jeromecoutant
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@adbridge let's start CI ?
Thx

@adbridge
Copy link
Contributor

CI started

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Mar 31, 2021

Jenkins CI Test : ✔️ SUCCESS

Build Number: 1 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-test ✔️

@adbridge adbridge merged commit 7389671 into ARMmbed:master Mar 31, 2021
@mergify mergify bot removed the ready for merge label Mar 31, 2021
@jeromecoutant jeromecoutant deleted the PR_L5_PACK branch April 1, 2021 14:52
@mbedmain mbedmain removed release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch Release-pending labels Apr 26, 2021
@jeromecoutant jeromecoutant mentioned this pull request Aug 20, 2021
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@adbridge adbridge adbridge approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@Patater Patater Patater approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

component: tools release-version: 6.10.0

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

DISCO_L562QE - device_name missing in targets.json

6 participants

@jeromecoutant @ciarmcom @adbridge @mbed-ci @Patater @mbedmain