Skip to content

Conversation

majecty
Copy link
Contributor

@majecty majecty commented Feb 13, 2020

No description provided.

@majecty majecty added the ics Interchain standard label Feb 13, 2020
@majecty majecty force-pushed the f/ics-conn-open-try branch 2 times, most recently from a4b6f70 to 99b0513 Compare February 17, 2020 06:40
@majecty majecty changed the title [WIP] Implementing connOpenTry datagram in the ICS connection spec Implement connOpenTry datagram in the ICS connection spec Feb 17, 2020
I omit vector commitment and light client part. I will fill the part
after we merge them in the PoC branch.
@majecty majecty force-pushed the f/ics-conn-open-try branch from 99b0513 to db33a78 Compare February 17, 2020 08:00
@majecty majecty requested a review from junha1 February 17, 2020 08:01
consensus_height,
} => {
s.begin_list(10);
s.append(&DatagramTag::ConnOpenTry)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we really need to improve macro to support enum and tuple someday...

@majecty majecty merged commit daa5dae into CodeChain-io:ics-poc Feb 17, 2020
@majecty majecty deleted the f/ics-conn-open-try branch February 17, 2020 09:09
fn verify_connection_state(
&self,
ctx: &mut dyn ibc::Context,
connection: &ConnectionEnd,
Copy link
Contributor

@junha1 junha1 Feb 17, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you explain the meaning of this argument? @majecty (compared to connection_end)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I checked the spec. The spec is not using it. Please ignore the argument.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ics Interchain standard

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants