Skip to content

Conversation

Jack251970
Copy link
Member

@Jack251970 Jack251970 commented Apr 9, 2025

I think it is okay to set max result lower limit to 1.

Fix #3341

@prlabeler prlabeler bot added the bug Something isn't working label Apr 9, 2025
Copy link

gitstream-cm bot commented Apr 9, 2025

🚨 Warning: Approaching Monthly Automation Limit

Monthly PRs automated: 225/250

Your organization has used over 90% of its monthly quota for gitStream automations. Once the quota is reached, new pull requests for this month will not trigger gitStream automations and will be marked as “Skipped”.

To avoid interruptions, consider optimizing your automation usage or upgrading your plan by contacting LinearB.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 9, 2025

@check-spelling-bot Report

🔴 Please review

See the 📂 files view, the 📜action log, or 📝 job summary for details.

❌ Errors Count
❌ forbidden-pattern 22
⚠️ non-alpha-in-dictionary 19

See ❌ Event descriptions for more information.

If the flagged items are 🤯 false positives

If items relate to a ...

  • binary file (or some other file you wouldn't want to check at all).

    Please add a file path to the excludes.txt file matching the containing file.

    File paths are Perl 5 Regular Expressions - you can test yours before committing to verify it will match your files.

    ^ refers to the file's path from the root of the repository, so ^README\.md$ would exclude README.md (on whichever branch you're using).

  • well-formed pattern.

    If you can write a pattern that would match it,
    try adding it to the patterns.txt file.

    Patterns are Perl 5 Regular Expressions - you can test yours before committing to verify it will match your lines.

    Note that patterns can't match multiline strings.

@Jack251970 Jack251970 enabled auto-merge April 9, 2025 01:32
Copy link

gitstream-cm bot commented Apr 9, 2025

🥷 Code experts: Yusyuriv

Jack251970 has most 👩‍💻 activity in the files.
Yusyuriv has most 🧠 knowledge in the files.

See details

Plugins/Flow.Launcher.Plugin.Explorer/ViewModels/SettingsViewModel.cs

Activity based on git-commit:

Jack251970
APR
MAR
FEB
JAN
DEC
NOV 3 additions & 4 deletions

Knowledge based on git-blame:
Yusyuriv: 23%

To learn more about /:\ gitStream - Visit our Docs

Copy link

gitstream-cm bot commented Apr 9, 2025

Be a legend 🏆 by adding a before and after screenshot of the changes you made, especially if they are around UI/UX.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 9, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This update modifies the SettingsViewModel in the Explorer plugin by changing the MaxResultLowerLimit property value from 100 to 1. The adjustment allows users to set the maximum results below the previous lower bound, thereby addressing the issue where values under 100 were automatically adjusted.

Changes

File Change Summary
Plugins/Flow.Launcher.Plugin.Explorer/.../SettingsViewModel.cs Updated the MaxResultLowerLimit property value from 100 to 1.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
BUG: Explorer Maximum results can't be set to less than 100 (#3341)

Suggested labels

enhancement

Suggested reviewers

  • jjw24

Poem

I'm a hopping rabbit with a code delight,
Tweaking limits by day and night.
From one hundred high to a humble one,
My little paws fixed what needed to be done.
Celebrate with a skip and a joyful hop! 🐇


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d33e751 and 47743e6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Plugins/Flow.Launcher.Plugin.Explorer/ViewModels/SettingsViewModel.cs (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: gitStream.cm
  • GitHub Check: gitStream.cm
  • GitHub Check: gitStream.cm
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Plugins/Flow.Launcher.Plugin.Explorer/ViewModels/SettingsViewModel.cs (1)

527-527: Appropriate change to allow greater user flexibility

Changing the MaxResultLowerLimit from 100 to 1 directly addresses the issue by allowing users to set a much lower maximum result count. This is a straightforward and effective solution that gives users more control over the number of results displayed. The MaxResult property will now clamp values between 1 and 100000 instead of 100 and 100000.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Jack251970 Jack251970 merged commit d230ebe into dev Apr 9, 2025
13 checks passed
@Jack251970 Jack251970 deleted the explorer_limit branch April 9, 2025 07:08
@jjw24 jjw24 added this to the 1.20.0 milestone Apr 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

BUG: Explorer Maximum results can't be set to less than 100

3 participants