Skip to content

Conversation

justinsheu
Copy link
Contributor

πŸ“ Summary

  • 1. ...

βœ… Checklist

Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @justinsheu, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a significant quality-of-life improvement by enabling the tracer to automatically create a project if it cannot be resolved during initialization. This change eliminates the need for manual project creation in advance, preventing potential errors and ensuring a smoother setup and operation for users, ultimately enhancing the reliability of Judgment export.

Highlights

  • Automatic Project Creation: The tracer now automatically creates a project if it doesn't already exist during initialization, streamlining the setup process and preventing errors.
  • New Project Creation Utility: A static method _create_project has been added to encapsulate the API call logic for creating new projects.
  • Improved Initialization Flow: The previous error message that would halt tracing if a project was not found has been replaced with the new auto-creation logic, ensuring continuous operation.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with πŸ‘ and πŸ‘Ž on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a helpful feature to automatically create a project if it doesn't exist during tracer initialization, which improves the user experience by removing a manual setup step. The overall logic is sound. I've added a couple of comments for minor improvements regarding a docstring and error handling.

Comment on lines 264 to 268
except Exception as e:
judgeval_logger.error(
f"Failed to create project with name {project_name}: {e} ... Skipping Judgment export."
)
return None
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

Catching a generic Exception is risky as it can hide unexpected errors (like KeyboardInterrupt or SystemExit) and make debugging more difficult. It's better to catch only the specific exceptions you anticipate from the API call, such as JudgmentAPIError for API-related issues and httpx.RequestError for network problems. This will make the error handling more robust. Note that you'll need to import these exception types.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we have a good idea of what possible errors there would be? Is it mainly JudgmentAPIError and httpx.RequestError?

I'm trying to think in my head how annoying catching all exceptions would be, in the KeyboardInterrupt and SystemExit cases

def _create_project(
project_name: str, api_key: str, organization_id: str
) -> str | None:
"""Resolve project_id from project_name using the API."""
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This docstring appears to be copied from _resolve_project_id and is incorrect. It should be updated to reflect that this method's purpose is to create a new project.

Suggested change
"""Resolve project_id from project_name using the API."""
"""Create a new project with the given name."""

Copy link
Collaborator

@JCamyre JCamyre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Quick question for you

Comment on lines 264 to 268
except Exception as e:
judgeval_logger.error(
f"Failed to create project with name {project_name}: {e} ... Skipping Judgment export."
)
return None
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we have a good idea of what possible errors there would be? Is it mainly JudgmentAPIError and httpx.RequestError?

I'm trying to think in my head how annoying catching all exceptions would be, in the KeyboardInterrupt and SystemExit cases

@JCamyre JCamyre enabled auto-merge (squash) October 2, 2025 00:23
Copy link
Collaborator

@JCamyre JCamyre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@JCamyre JCamyre merged commit f0875a3 into staging Oct 8, 2025
17 checks passed
justinsheu added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2025
adivate2021 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants