Skip to content

Major overhaul to improve types #38

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jul 19, 2022
Merged

Major overhaul to improve types #38

merged 10 commits into from
Jul 19, 2022

Conversation

JeffFessler
Copy link
Member

@JeffFessler JeffFessler commented Jul 18, 2022

Should address #30 and simplifies a lot of construction code.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 18, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #38 (438c041) into main (507d9f5) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #38   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           15        15           
  Lines          487       449   -38     
=========================================
- Hits           487       449   -38     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/cuboid.jl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/ellipse.jl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/ellipsoid.jl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/focus-chart.jl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/gauss2.jl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/gauss3.jl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/object.jl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/object2.jl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/object3.jl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/rect.jl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 3 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 507d9f5...438c041. Read the comment docs.

@JeffFessler JeffFessler marked this pull request as ready for review July 18, 2022 15:11
@JeffFessler
Copy link
Member Author

@johnnychen94, your suggestion led to this big overhaul, and it really improved things I think.
I might make some further refinements. Any comments on this version?

Copy link

@johnnychen94 johnnychen94 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

@JeffFessler JeffFessler merged commit 72e4a34 into main Jul 19, 2022
@JeffFessler JeffFessler deleted the type branch July 19, 2022 13:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants