Skip to content

Conversation

@mark-summerfield
Copy link
Contributor

The example used identifier x for two different purposes. While this isn't a problem for Julia, it makes humans have to read much more carefully. For examples I think it is much clearer to use different identifiers for different purposes.

The example used identifier `x` for two different purposes. While this isn't a problem for Julia, it makes humans have to read much more carefully. For examples I think it is much clearer to use different identifiers for different purposes.
@fredrikekre fredrikekre merged commit 6354405 into JuliaLang:master Sep 20, 2018
@fredrikekre fredrikekre added docs This change adds or pertains to documentation backport pending 1.0 labels Sep 20, 2018
KristofferC pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2018
The example used identifier `x` for two different purposes. While this isn't a problem for Julia, it makes humans have to read much more carefully. For examples I think it is much clearer to use different identifiers for different purposes.

(cherry picked from commit 6354405)
KristofferC pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2019
The example used identifier `x` for two different purposes. While this isn't a problem for Julia, it makes humans have to read much more carefully. For examples I think it is much clearer to use different identifiers for different purposes.

(cherry picked from commit 6354405)
KristofferC pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2020
The example used identifier `x` for two different purposes. While this isn't a problem for Julia, it makes humans have to read much more carefully. For examples I think it is much clearer to use different identifiers for different purposes.

(cherry picked from commit 6354405)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

docs This change adds or pertains to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants