Skip to content

Conversation

@gisi90
Copy link
Contributor

@gisi90 gisi90 commented May 18, 2022

No description provided.

@gisi90 gisi90 requested a review from joernu76 May 18, 2022 07:57
@joernu76
Copy link
Member

a) There was an ancient PR, which wasn't merged. Sorry, I assumed you'd press the button. This causes now conflicts.
b) I assume this is way faster in processing. However, I am very unhappy w.r.t. to maintainability. The copy-pasting of all the shell-scripts gives fast results, but may cause a lot of issues at a later point in time, when changes have to be applied to a dozen places, instead of one central point.
We can put it here as it is, but not as the main-branch, which should more serve as a simple-to-understand exemplary flow.
Yours is an operational flow, which is necessarily more complicated.

@joernu76 joernu76 changed the base branch from main to operational July 13, 2023 11:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants