Fix calculation of the non-exceptional shift values in LAPACK complex QZ #3091
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
There is a spelling mistake LSAME instead of LLSAME. |
Could somebody please confirm or refute this? I'm proposing this as a patch downstream (for Julia) |
|
Oh, right you are - seems gfortran is not visibly annoyed as it "only" affects the declaration as EXTERNAL. |
|
Thanks for the confirmation |
This was referenced Mar 30, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
from the updated version of Reference-LAPACK PR 477, solving occasional (rare?) convergence failures in complex GGEV/GGES
Original issue is Reference-LAPACK/lapack#475