Skip to content

Conversation

@tarcieri
Copy link
Member

@tarcieri tarcieri commented Aug 4, 2025

Changed

  • Migrated from generic-array to hybrid-array (#944)
  • Edition changed to 2024 and MSRV bumped to 1.85 (#1149)
  • Seal the Dbl trait (#1198)

Closes #1077

@tarcieri tarcieri requested a review from newpavlov August 4, 2025 21:27
Copy link
Member

@newpavlov newpavlov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have left some concerns here, but it's not a blocker and I am fine with merging it as-is.

@tarcieri
Copy link
Member Author

tarcieri commented Aug 5, 2025

I think we should release it, but as noted in #1077 we can also continue working on a replacement in parallel, and it's easy to replace

@newpavlov
Copy link
Member

I think we can move forward with this after rebase (don't forget to update the release date and changelog in OP).

@tarcieri tarcieri merged commit 8a58487 into master Aug 6, 2025
101 checks passed
@tarcieri tarcieri deleted the dbl/v0.4.0 branch August 6, 2025 13:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

dbl: retire crate and vendor implementation into downstream users?

3 participants