Skip to content

Explicitly implement Clone for Antichain #419

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 10, 2021
Merged

Explicitly implement Clone for Antichain #419

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
11 changes: 10 additions & 1 deletion timely/src/progress/frontier.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ use crate::order::PartialOrder;
/// Two antichains are equal if the contain the same set of elements, even if in different orders.
/// This can make equality testing quadratic, though linear in the common case that the sequences
/// are identical.
#[derive(Clone, Debug, Default, Abomonation, Serialize, Deserialize)]
#[derive(Debug, Default, Abomonation, Serialize, Deserialize)]
pub struct Antichain<T> {
elements: Vec<T>
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -218,6 +218,15 @@ impl<T: PartialOrder> PartialOrder for Antichain<T> {
}
}

impl<T: Clone> Clone for Antichain<T> {
fn clone(&self) -> Self {
Antichain { elements: self.elements.clone() }
}
fn clone_from(&mut self, source: &Self) {
self.elements.clone_from(&source.elements)
}
}

impl<T: PartialOrder> From<Vec<T>> for Antichain<T> {
fn from(vec: Vec<T>) -> Self {
// TODO: We could reuse `vec` with some care.
Expand Down