Restrict tests to FillArrays 1.0.0

[torfjelde]

Attempt to fix tests as per TuringLang/DistributionsAD.jl#248

[devmotion]

Shouldn't we also (even retro-actively) bound FillArrays in the Turing package itself to avoid that users run into these issues?

[torfjelde]

Possibly! My worry about that is that:

1. We're losing out on 1.1. and 1.2 just because of these somewhat specific scenarios. This doesn't seem to be an issue that occurs very widely.
2. Could quickly run into an issue where one of our deps bump their compat bound because of some bug that was fixed after 1.0.0, in which case the user won't be able to stay on the most recent version of Turing.

IMO we don't for now, and then if we get people running into this issue in practice, we bound Turing too.

[devmotion]

In my impression this FillArrays issue is a major problem as it affects (log) normal distributions (see, e.g., https://github.com/TuringLang/DistributionsAD.jl/actions/runs/5258560449/jobs/9502944457). I guess there are just not more test failures in Turing since we don't test as exhaustively as in DistributionsAD. Hence I think we should completely remove any use of FillArrays > 1.0.0 from the Turing ecosystem until these upstream issues are debugged and fixed.

[github-actions]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 5304666098

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 0.0%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 5278353164:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	0
Relevant Lines:	1427

---

💛 - Coveralls

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (6a307cd) 0.00% compared to head (66e75fb) 0.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #2014   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    0.00%   0.00%           
======================================
  Files          21      21           
  Lines        1427    1427           
======================================
  Misses       1427    1427           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[torfjelde]

Aight, let's do that then 👍

[torfjelde]

No wonder this test has been causing so much annoyance 😅

[torfjelde]

Happy with this now @devmotion ?:)