Skip to content

Daily Backlog Burner - Research, Roadmap and Plan #7895

@github-actions

Description

@github-actions

Daily Backlog Burner - Research, Roadmap and Plan

Overview

Z3 is a mature theorem prover from Microsoft Research with a substantial codebase and active community. After comprehensive analysis of the repository structure, open issues, pull requests, and project documentation, this document outlines a strategic roadmap for addressing the project's backlog through systematic improvements.

Project Analysis

Core Project Information

  • Primary Language: C++ (C++20 standard)
  • Build Systems: CMake (recommended), Python mk_make.py, Bazel, vcpkg
  • Key Components: SAT solver, SMT theories, API bindings (C, C++, Python, Java, .NET, OCaml)
  • Testing: Custom unit testing framework, regression tests
  • Platforms: Windows, Linux, macOS, with specialized builds for Android, WASM, Pyodide

Current Status Assessment

**(redacted)

  • Well-maintained API documentation and release process
  • Active development with regular releases (latest: 4.15.3)
  • Strong performance focus with ongoing optimization work
  • Comprehensive language bindings and platform support
  • Good CI/CD pipeline with Azure Pipelines and GitHub Actions

**Areas Requiring (redacted)

  • Development tooling could be modernized (lacks .clang-format file)
  • Unit testing framework is homegrown and could benefit from standardization
  • Some long-standing enhancement requests remain unaddressed
  • Build/release process has some platform-specific issues

Backlog Analysis

High-Priority Bugs (7 open)

  • Performance regressions: Version 4.13.3 → 4.15.2 convergence issues
  • API inconsistencies: Python API vs CLI result discrepancies
  • Model validation: Invalid model generation in string/sequence operations
  • Arithmetic optimization: Correctness issues in opt.optsmt_engine=symba

Development Infrastructure Enhancements (Help Wanted: 3 open)

  1. Code formatting standardization (Clang-format file #1441) - Add .clang-format file
  2. Build system improvements (Bad .dylib versioning in pip package. #6651) - Fix .dylib versioning in pip packages
  3. Java packaging (Bundling Dynamic Libraries Inside JAR for Ease of Redistribution #182) - Bundle dynamic libraries in JAR files

Long-term Feature Requests (8 open)

Strategic Roadmap

Phase 1: Development Infrastructure (Immediate Impact)

Priority: High | Timeline: 2-4 weeks | Impact: Developer Experience

  1. Add .clang-format file (Clang-format file #1441)

    • Analyze existing C++ code style patterns
    • Create comprehensive .clang-format configuration
    • Test with existing codebase to ensure compatibility
    • Document usage in developer guide
  2. Fix build/packaging issues

  3. Testing infrastructure improvements

    • Evaluate modern C++ testing frameworks (GoogleTest, Catch2)
    • Create migration plan for existing unit tests
    • Address Windows-specific test guards that limit CI coverage

Phase 2: Code Quality & Maintenance (Foundation Building)

Priority: Medium-High | Timeline: 4-6 weeks | Impact: Long-term Maintainability

  1. Unit test modernization (Unit tests need clean up #1163)

    • Replace SASSERT-based tests with proper assertions
    • Remove platform-specific guards where unnecessary
    • Implement proper error handling and exit codes
  2. Documentation improvements

    • Create/update developer contribution guidelines
    • Enhance API documentation generation process
    • Improve build documentation for all supported platforms
  3. Code organization

Phase 3: Bug Resolution & Performance (User Impact)

Priority: High | Timeline: 3-5 weeks | Impact: User Experience

  1. Critical bug fixes

  2. Long-standing correctness issues

Phase 4: Feature Enhancements (Community Value)

Priority: Medium | Timeline: 6-8 weeks | Impact: API Usability

  1. Python API improvements (Feature request: add regex translator to Python API #5860)

    • Implement regex translator functionality
    • Enhance API documentation and examples
  2. Java ecosystem improvements (Bundling Dynamic Libraries Inside JAR for Ease of Redistribution #182)

    • Bundle dynamic libraries in JAR distributions
    • Simplify Java integration workflow

Phase 5: Advanced Features (Strategic)

Priority: Lower | Timeline: 8-12 weeks | Impact: Advanced Use Cases

  1. Solver persistence (Feature: Persisting the solver state and Resuming from it. #2095)

    • Research state serialization feasibility
    • Prototype save/restore functionality for incremental solving
  2. Performance optimizations

    • Continue work that doesn't overlap with existing performance PRs
    • Focus on complementary areas not covered by current efforts

Risk Mitigation & Constraints

Active Development Conflicts

Compatibility Considerations

  • API Stability: Maintain backward compatibility for all public APIs
  • Platform Support: Ensure changes work across all supported platforms
  • Build System: Support all existing build methods (CMake, Python, Bazel)

Testing Strategy

  • Regression Prevention: Comprehensive testing before merging changes
  • CI Integration: Ensure all changes pass existing CI/CD pipelines
  • Performance Validation: Benchmark performance-impacting changes

Success Metrics

Phase 1 Success Criteria

  • .clang-format file added and verified with existing codebase
  • pip package .dylib versioning fixed
  • At least 2 help-wanted issues resolved

Phase 2 Success Criteria

  • Modern unit testing framework integrated
  • Developer documentation improved
  • Include folder structure implemented

Phase 3 Success Criteria

  • Critical performance regressions resolved
  • API consistency issues fixed
  • All high-priority bugs addressed

Implementation Approach

Development Methodology

  1. Conservative Changes: Prioritize backward compatibility
  2. Incremental Progress: Small, reviewable pull requests
  3. Community Engagement: Regular updates and maintainer feedback
  4. Quality Assurance: Comprehensive testing for each change

Collaboration Strategy

  • Maintainer Engagement: Regular communication with core team
  • Community Feedback: Incorporate user and contributor input
  • Documentation: Maintain detailed progress tracking
  • Knowledge Sharing: Document decisions and rationale

Conclusion

This roadmap provides a systematic approach to improving Z3's development experience, code quality, and user satisfaction. By focusing on infrastructure first, then quality improvements, and finally feature enhancements, we can build a solid foundation for continued project success.

The phased approach ensures that each improvement builds upon previous work while minimizing risk to the stable, production-ready theorem prover that Z3 represents. Regular reassessment and community feedback will guide prioritization adjustments as work progresses.


> AI-generated content by Daily Backlog Burner may contain mistakes.

Generated by Agentic Workflow Run

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions