Skip to content

Conversation

juliannguyen4
Copy link
Collaborator

@juliannguyen4 juliannguyen4 commented Aug 26, 2025

Refactor query.results() by reusing code from query.foreach()

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 26, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 46 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (6a17390) to head (45e62c2).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on dev.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/main/query/foreach.c 0.00% 45 Missing ⚠️
src/main/query/results.c 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev    #821       +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.95%   0.00%   -81.96%     
==========================================
  Files          99      80       -19     
  Lines       14057   12179     -1878     
==========================================
- Hits        11520       0    -11520     
- Misses       2537   12179     +9642     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@juliannguyen4 juliannguyen4 changed the title [CLIENT-2417] Refactor query.results() by reusing code from query.foreach() [CLIENT-2417] query.results(): fix bug where records are missing records during a paginated query when the server has network disruptions Sep 25, 2025
@juliannguyen4 juliannguyen4 changed the title [CLIENT-2417] query.results(): fix bug where records are missing records during a paginated query when the server has network disruptions [CLIENT-2417] query.results(): fix bug where a paginated query is missing records when the server has network disruptions Sep 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants