[ Data.List ] function reverse-append _ʳ++_, simplify proofs about reverse #899
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…verse The properties are much easier to prove for the generalization of reverse to reverse-append.
[ci skip]
This patch should be undone along with making ++⁺ infix. In general, the predicate/relation-lifiting of an infix operator should be again an infix operator (arguments permitting).
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The properties are much easier to prove for the generalization of
reverse to reverse-append.
Should be backwards compatible.
In the future, we could deprecate
reverseAccin favor of_ʳ++_(reverse-append).