Skip to content

Conversation

@hui-zhou-a
Copy link
Collaborator

…rror

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 9, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 71.42857% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 82.68%. Comparing base (fc0c8fa) to head (8207864).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #967   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.68%   82.68%           
=======================================
  Files         160      160           
  Lines       21098    21098           
=======================================
+ Hits        17444    17445    +1     
+ Misses       3654     3653    -1     

@github-actions github-actions bot added the grpc-transition Changes that need to be included in gRPC transition label Jan 9, 2025
SMoraisAnsys
SMoraisAnsys previously approved these changes Jan 13, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@SMoraisAnsys SMoraisAnsys left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM but I would raise RuntimeError instead.

Raising ValueError is dedicated to cases where """operation or function receives an argument that has the right type but an inappropriate value""". Here, that's not the case :)

@hui-zhou-a hui-zhou-a merged commit 733701b into main Jan 13, 2025
30 checks passed
@hui-zhou-a hui-zhou-a deleted the fix-edb-cfg-create-pin-group branch January 13, 2025 14:30
@svandenb-dev svandenb-dev mentioned this pull request Mar 17, 2025
60 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

grpc-transition Changes that need to be included in gRPC transition

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants