[Variant] Add `ListBuilder::with_value` for convenience

[alamb]

Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe what you are trying to do.
I find myself annoyed at having to give names to the intermediate object / list builders in examples and tests.

Describe the solution you'd like

I would rather just use a builder style api

Describe alternatives you've considered
For example from

        {
            let mut list = builder.new_list();
            list.append_value("hello");
            list.append_value(42i32);
            list.append_value(true);
            list.append_value(()); // null
            list.append_value(std::f64::consts::PI);
            list.finish();
        }

to

        builder.new_list()
            .with_value("hello")
            .with_value(42i32)
            .with_value(true)
            .with_value(()) // null
            .with_value(std::f64::consts::PI)
            .finish()

Additional context
Related

• [Variant] Add ObjectBuilder::with_field for convenience #7949
• [Variant] Add ObjectBuilder::with_field for convenience #7950

[codephage2020]

take

[alamb]

label_issue.py automatically added labels {'parquet'} from #7959