[Variant] Support LargeString and StringView in batch_json_string_to_variant
#8163
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
alamb
approved these changes
Aug 18, 2025
| } | ||
| let mut variant_array_builder = VariantArrayBuilder::new(input.len()); | ||
|
|
||
| // Try each string array type in sequence |
Contributor
|
Merging so we can resolve conflicts with |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases. You can link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax.
StringViewandLargeStringin ´batch_json_string_to_variant` #8145.Rationale for this change
What changes are included in this PR?
Implement
LargeStringandStringViewprocess in json_to_variant convertion.Are these changes tested?
Yes, added tests
Are there any user-facing changes?
Yes, new string types are supported