-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
add procedures procedure #9385
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add procedures procedure #9385
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.19 #9385 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 15.07% 15.07% -0.01%
Complexity 11169 11169
============================================
Files 5405 5405
Lines 472677 472708 +31
Branches 60049 61718 +1669
============================================
+ Hits 71269 71271 +2
- Misses 393479 393509 +30
+ Partials 7929 7928 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Nice work @DaanHoogland!
Should we separate the |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 10344 |
I thought of that but wanted to check versions against each other. I will make that change. A change I won't make but what we need to do in another PR is cleaning the views from the schema update files. I encoutered a couple. |
|
@blueorangutan test |
|
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-10821)
|
|
@blueorangutan test matrix |
|
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos7 mgmt + xenserver71, rocky8 mgmt + vmware67u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-10828)
|
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 10364 |
|
@blueorangutan test matrix |
|
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos7 mgmt + xenserver71, rocky8 mgmt + vmware67u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-10849) |
@DaanHoogland |
that sounds good, but so far creating envs with this code doesn't work. I am not sure why yet, but giving that priority. (will keep it in mind though) |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 10386 |
|
[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-10900) |
|
[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-10904) |
|
[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-10908) |
|
[LL] Trillian Build Failed (tid-6958) |
|
[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-10918) |
|
[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-10921) |
c20be12 to
bd3512f
Compare
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 10415 |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-10927)
|
|
@GutoVeronezi i got this working and did some investigating on iterating over databases but all solutions so far seem overcomplicated. Let's revisist later, ok? |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-10936)
|
weizhouapache
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
code lgtm
just a tip for those who want to create the procedures manually
the SQLs do not work in mysql CLI as the default delimiter is ";", need to change to other value like "||"
DROP PROCEDURE IF EXISTS ...
DELIMITER ||
CREATE PROCEDURE ...
||
DELIMITER ;
vladimirpetrov
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM based on manual testing, I did some upgrade and smoke testing and found no issues.
Description
This PR...
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?