Skip to content

Improve performance of regexp_count #13011

@alamb

Description

@alamb

Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?

@Omega359 and @xinlifoobar added the regexp_count function in #12970

However, regexp_count seems to be significantly slower than regexp_match and regexp_like. (see #12080 (comment) for a benchmark)

Describe the solution you'd like

I would like to review the benchmark for regexp_count and figure out why it is slower and if so try to improve it

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

No response

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions