Skip to content

Conversation

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor

@alamb alamb commented Sep 25, 2024

Which issue does this PR close?

Follow on to #12269 from @jayzhan211

Rationale for this change

I had some minor suggestions during review: #12269 (review)

What changes are included in this PR?

  1. Move type checking into the same module that it needs to be kepy in sync with
  2. return internal error than panic on bug

Are these changes tested?

CI

Are there any user-facing changes?

Copy link
Contributor

@goldmedal goldmedal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @alamb it looks good to me. Only one minor suggestion for error handling.

@alamb alamb requested a review from jayzhan211 September 25, 2024 15:20
fn supported_type(data_type: &DataType) -> bool {
matches!(
*data_type,
DataType::Int8
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we use DataType::is_signed_integer DataType::is_unsigned_integer

we can also use is_numeric but it includes Decimals

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This list needs to be kept in sync with what special implementations are available in GroupValuesColumns -- I will add a comment to make that clearer

Copy link
Contributor

@comphead comphead left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm thanks @alamb

Copy link
Contributor

@jayzhan211 jayzhan211 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Sep 26, 2024

Thank you for the review @jayzhan211

@alamb alamb merged commit 9a3f8d1 into apache:main Sep 26, 2024
24 checks passed
@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Sep 26, 2024

Thanks @comphead and @jayzhan211

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

physical-expr Changes to the physical-expr crates

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants