Skip to content

Conversation

@parkma99
Copy link
Contributor

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #7344

Rationale for this change

What changes are included in this PR?

Are these changes tested?

Are there any user-facing changes?

@github-actions github-actions bot added logical-expr Logical plan and expressions physical-expr Changes to the physical-expr crates labels Aug 21, 2023
@JayjeetAtGithub
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for working on this @parkma99. The fix works great !

@parkma99 parkma99 marked this pull request as ready for review August 22, 2023 12:56
let args: Vec<ColumnarValue> = args
.iter()
.map(|col_value| {
cast_column(col_value, &DataType::Utf8, None).unwrap()
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In there ,I do not know how to handle this unwrap.

@tustvold
Copy link
Contributor

Perhaps we could implement this as part of the coercion rules as opposed to internal to the evaluation logic? See coerce_arguments_for_fun perhaps?

@parkma99
Copy link
Contributor Author

Perhaps we could implement this as part of the coercion rules as opposed to internal to the evaluation logic? See coerce_arguments_for_fun perhaps?

Thank you, it looks good, I will have a try lately

@parkma99
Copy link
Contributor Author

in #7344 (comment)

But I think it might also be necessary to make the LENGTH function support binaries.

I think it is a good solution. What do you think @tustvold ?

@tustvold
Copy link
Contributor

Responded on the linked ticket

@github-actions github-actions bot added the optimizer Optimizer rules label Aug 24, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the physical-expr Changes to the physical-expr crates label Aug 24, 2023
@parkma99
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @tustvold @JayjeetAtGithub

Copy link
Contributor

@alamb alamb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for working on this @parkma99 and @JayjeetAtGithub

Can we please add a .slt level test for this functionality?

I think there is a single coercion rule change (the same as https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/7365/files#r1303360870) that will fix this issue as well

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

logical-expr Logical plan and expressions optimizer Optimizer rules sqllogictest SQL Logic Tests (.slt)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Internal error: The "character_length" function can only accept strings

4 participants