-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 1.7k
Fix count(null) and count(distinct null) #8511
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am slightly worried about the need to allocate a new null buffer each time, even for arrays when we could just use the exising one
This is particularly concerning given this is on the critical path in aggregates
I reviewed the
logical_nullsmethod --https://docs.rs/arrow/latest/arrow/array/trait.Array.html#method.logical_nulls and I see the issue is that it returns an owned Option
What would you think about implemeting a method in
DataFusionthat avoids the copy if it is not necessary, likeThat only creates the nulll buffer for
NullArrays?Then we can propose upstreaming that back to arrow-rs to avoid the potential performance issue
I know the Cow thing is not always the easiest to make happen -- if you need help I can try and find time to help code it up.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure how I would implement this outside of the
Arraytrait while ensuring that all cases are covered. Originally I had some branching logic based on the datatype but removed it after the discussion here: #8511 (comment)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah @alamb in the end
NullBufferhasArc<Bytes>so it mostly clones this + a fewusizes etc. While not ideal I don't think it will be very expensive?https://arrow.apache.org/rust/arrow_buffer/buffer/immutable/struct.Buffer.html
But I like the suggestion of returning a reference or
Cowin arrow-rs.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not opposed to this PR, but I would prefer to have the
Cowthing. Let me see if I can whip it up quicklyThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here is my proposal for improvement: coralogix#221