HBASE-28564 Refactor direct interactions of Reference file creations to SFT interface

[gvprathyusha6]

HBASE-27826 introduces tracking of Link/Reference files with StoreFileTracker interface and with that, we can have the FileBasedStoreFileTracker implementation to track Link/Reference files only using .filelist file itself and not create actual link/ref files (virtual links).

To support the same, we need to refactor all the direct interactions of Ref/Link file creations to SFT layer and this changes starts off with moving the current Reference file operations/logic to StoreFileTrackerBase.
Post that we should be able to override/evolve the representation to handle Virtual Links.

Change detail

1. Modifies HStoreFile constructors to take SFT instance as a parameter.

2. Add apis in SFT to create StoreFileInfo objects and use that everywhere

3. Removes HRegionFileSystem.getStoreFiles(final String familyName, final boolean validate) and helper methods in Snapshot apis itself.

4. Adds hasReferences api in SFT, the idea is to use SFT.hasReferences() instead of HRegionFileSystem.hasReferences(), we haven't moved all file listing to SFT yet and will be handled in a different JIRA.

5. Adds a helper method to create StoreFileInfo for a HFile which is not Reference/HFileLink used for uts.

6. StoreFile.jsp fails to print data for Reference/Link files, this needs a minor refactor, which can be accommodated in the same PR or as part of another jira

[apurtell]

As we -- necessarily! -- indirect all actions that touch the region filesystem through the store file tracker we will cause it to do more work. We should have a metric for the number of times the FileBasedStoreFileTracker reads the "backedfile" and another metric for the number of times the FileBasedStoreFileTracker writes the "backedfile" , so we can compare the impact of these changes and also optimize where possible those occurrences to a minimum.

Let's do this as a followup. @gvprathyusha6
In fact if we can make that change and commit it before this one, we can track the impact of these changes. Consider it a nice to have such information for evaluating next steps, not a prerequisite for commit. We should have these changes anyway.

Also it appears there are some minor conflicts now to be resolved.

[gvprathyusha6]

As we -- necessarily! -- indirect all actions that touch the region filesystem through the store file tracker we will cause it to do more work. We should have a metric for the number of times the FileBasedStoreFileTracker reads the "backedfile" and another metric for the number of times the FileBasedStoreFileTracker writes the "backedfile" , so we can compare the impact of these changes and also optimize where possible those occurrences to a minimum.

Let's do this as a followup. @gvprathyusha6 In fact if we can make that change and commit it before this one, we can track the impact of these changes. Consider it a nice to have such information for evaluating next steps, not a prerequisite for commit. We should have these changes anyway.

Also it appears there are some minor conflicts now to be resolved.

Agreed, having these metrics would be great to understand the impact, created HBASE-28907

[Apache-HBase]

🎊 +1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	0m 58s		Docker mode activated.
			_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 1s		No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗	codespell	0m 0s		codespell was not available.
+0 🆗	detsecrets	0m 0s		detect-secrets was not available.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s		The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 💚	hbaseanti	0m 0s		Patch does not have any anti-patterns.
			_ master Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	4m 45s		master passed
+1 💚	compile	5m 3s		master passed
+1 💚	checkstyle	0m 48s		master passed
+1 💚	spotbugs	2m 44s		master passed
+1 💚	spotless	1m 18s		branch has no errors when running spotless:check.
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	4m 45s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	5m 9s		the patch passed
+1 💚	javac	5m 8s		the patch passed
+1 💚	blanks	0m 0s		The patch has no blanks issues.
-0 ⚠️	checkstyle	1m 3s	/results-checkstyle-hbase-server.txt	hbase-server: The patch generated 1 new + 130 unchanged - 1 fixed = 131 total (was 131)
+1 💚	spotbugs	2m 40s		the patch passed
+1 💚	hadoopcheck	15m 38s		Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 3.3.6 3.4.0.
+1 💚	spotless	1m 14s		patch has no errors when running spotless:check.
			_ Other Tests _
+1 💚	asflicense	0m 23s		The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
		56m 34s

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.47 ServerAPI=1.47 base: https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-5939/29/artifact/yetus-general-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#5939
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense javac spotbugs checkstyle codespell detsecrets compile hadoopcheck hbaseanti spotless
uname	Linux b747ad450d68 5.4.0-195-generic #215-Ubuntu SMP Fri Aug 2 18:28:05 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
git revision	master / 6e7ff98
Default Java	Eclipse Adoptium-17.0.11+9
Max. process+thread count	83 (vs. ulimit of 30000)
modules	C: hbase-server U: hbase-server
Console output	https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-5939/29/console
versions	git=2.34.1 maven=3.9.8 spotbugs=4.7.3
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.15.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

[Apache-HBase]

🎊 +1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	0m 16s		Docker mode activated.
-0 ⚠️	yetus	0m 3s		Unprocessed flag(s): --brief-report-file --spotbugs-strict-precheck --author-ignore-list --blanks-eol-ignore-file --blanks-tabs-ignore-file --quick-hadoopcheck
			_ Prechecks _
			_ master Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	3m 0s		master passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 57s		master passed
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 30s		master passed
+1 💚	shadedjars	5m 10s		branch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	2m 53s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 56s		the patch passed
+1 💚	javac	0m 56s		the patch passed
-0 ⚠️	javadoc	0m 29s	/results-javadoc-javadoc-hbase-server.txt	hbase-server generated 6 new + 55 unchanged - 0 fixed = 61 total (was 55)
+1 💚	shadedjars	5m 9s		patch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
			_ Other Tests _
+1 💚	unit	215m 50s		hbase-server in the patch passed.
		240m 11s

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.47 ServerAPI=1.47 base: https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-5939/29/artifact/yetus-jdk17-hadoop3-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#5939
Optional Tests	javac javadoc unit compile shadedjars
uname	Linux cc991ae9f973 5.4.0-192-generic #212-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jul 5 09:47:39 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
git revision	master / 6e7ff98
Default Java	Eclipse Adoptium-17.0.11+9
Test Results	https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-5939/29/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	5352 (vs. ulimit of 30000)
modules	C: hbase-server U: hbase-server
Console output	https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-5939/29/console
versions	git=2.34.1 maven=3.9.8
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.15.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

[apurtell]

Any concerns about merging this? I plan to do so this first thing tomorrow, so about 20 hours from now.